Supplier Quality Operating System

The supplier quality record,
captured at the source.

SQOS captures containment, counts, and conformance straight from the systems you already run, so the record is proof, not reconstruction.

FOR SUPPLIER QUALITY ENGINEERS & THE LEADERS WHO ANSWER FOR THE NUMBERS

SQOS Command Center - open SCARs, deviations to disposition, PPAPs to review, open chargeback liability, plus the review queue and top suppliers by containment.
A look inside

From qualification to proof, on a single record.

The work moves through three stages — plan and qualify, detect and resolve, then prove it — and SQOS keeps all three on one record, captured from the systems you already run. Previews below, shown with representative data.

Plan & qualify

Qualify the part before it reaches the line.

APQP and NPI gates, the full PPAP element package, first-article inspection, and the plans that route every characteristic. Approvals live on the record, not in an inbox.

  • APQP / NPI
  • PPAP
  • First article (AS9102)
  • Inspection plan & routing
A PPAP submission in SQOS: an 18-element package at 15 of 18 elements complete, each one checked off, for a bracket under review.
PPAP — the 18-element package, tracked element by element.
Detect & resolve

Catch it, contain it, close it.

Nonconformances captured where they happen, escalated to SCAR with the 8D inside the ticket, deviations dispositioned through MRB. Aging is visible long before it turns into a past-due problem.

  • NCR register
  • SCAR / 8D
  • Supplier deviations
  • MRB / CAB
SCAR aging in SQOS: open corrective actions bucketed at 0-30, 31-60, and over 60 days, with a thirteen-week aging trend.
SCAR aging — corrective actions by age bucket, over 13 weeks.
Analytics

Prove it in the numbers.

First-pass yield, PPM, and cost of poor quality, computed from inspection lots and reconciled to containment. The open-versus-closed picture is one you can stand behind in a review.

  • First-pass yield
  • PPM
  • Cost of poor quality
  • Scorecards & QBR
Quality analytics in SQOS: open versus closed corrective actions tracked across thirteen weeks.
Open vs closed — the corrective-action backlog, tracked weekly.
One record · from the source to recovery
NCR-2026-0188SCAR-2026-0031CB-5004
OPEN
Nonconformance · caught at receivingSupplier corrective action · 8DChargeback · recovered
PartATL-21090-A · Structural rib, machined Al
SupplierSterling Machining & Fab. · CAGE 8K2Q4
PO / linePO-87904 · Atlas
SourceReceiving inspectionRECV
RequirementMill cert · heat traceability
FindingCert absent at receipt · heat unverified
DispositionHold · detected 2026-01-24
D3 ContainmentLot segregated pending certQE ✓
D4 Root causeCert not released at ship · process gap
D5 CorrectiveCert-at-ship gate · heat traceability
D6 VerifiedHeat 4471 reconciled · lot clearedCERT
Reinspection$3,300
Sort / rework$4,000
Administrative$2,000
Scrap · unverifiable$3,000
Recovered$12,300
RECOVERED · $12,300 · TRACED TO SOURCE
NCRSCARRECOVERY
SCROLL
One operating system
SQOSOPERATING SYSTEM ERPENTERPRISE WMSWAREHOUSE MESMFG EXECUTION CONTAINMENTIN-SCAR SCORECARDCONTINUOUS CHARGEBACKRECOVERY EVIDENCEPPAP / FAI
SCROLL
Positioning

You can’t forecast a nonconformance.

Purchasing and supply planning run on forecasts. Supplier quality runs on what just went wrong, a nonconformance that can surface at any stage and has to be resolved fast, with the whole record already in hand. A portal collects information; it was never built to run that work.

DATA SITS
Supplier portal

A place to submit information.

  • Suppliers log in. Documents get uploaded. Forms get submitted.
  • Someone still chases updates by email and reconciles the truth by hand.
  • Containment lives in a separate spreadsheet. Counts are whatever was typed.
  • The scorecard is a monthly export that's stale the day it's sent.
SQOSDATA RUNS
Supplier Quality Operating System

A system that runs the operation.

  • Containment lives inside the SCAR, tied to the part, lot, and disposition.
  • Counts come straight from WMS and MES through the API.
  • Every event posts to scorecards and chargebacks as it happens.
  • The record stays current because the system keeps it current.
The number

Quality events are dollars. SQOS makes them recoverable.

When a containment, a chargeback, or a nonconformance is captured as a transaction instead of a conversation, the cost stops disappearing. Supply chain and quality leaders get one current view of liability, recovery, and supplier performance, the number they actually answer for.

The SQOS command center KPI band: recovered value, cost of poor quality, and open liability shown as running totals with period-over-period deltas, with sample data.
Recovery ledger — recovered value and open liability, at a glance.
1
system of record
8
quality workflows
3
source systems · WMS·MES·ERP
0
spreadsheets to chase
Questions

The questions buyers actually ask.

How is this different from the supplier portal we already have?+
A portal is where suppliers submit information; SQOS runs the work on top of it. Containment lives inside the SCAR, counts come from your WMS and MES, and every event posts to scorecards and chargebacks on its own. The real difference is whether the record is captured at the source or reconstructed after the fact.
How deep does the integration actually go?+
Past reading a BOM to populate a field. SQOS pulls live operational transactions, material counts, inspection results, dispositions, from your WMS, MES, and ERP through the API, so the quality record reflects what is happening on the floor. Connector breadth is expanding as part of our funded backend roadmap; in a demo we will show you exactly what connects today.
What does it cost?+
Pricing is scoped to your sites, suppliers, and volume rather than published as a flat number, so we set it together. The plans page lays out what each tier unlocks.
Get started
Interested? Book a demo
Ready to dive in? See our plans
More questions? Contact